Previous
|
Students
Bob Sturm, Elec & Comp Engineering
|
Faculty
Advisors
Jerry Gibson, Elec & Comp Engineering
Curtis Roads, Media Arts & Tech
|
Next
 |
|
Abstract
The relatively recent signal time-decomposition
method "matching pursuits" (MP) may provide an interesting
tool for high-resolution time-frequency distributions, signal denoising,
and audio coding. This method essentially finds good approximations
of signals using a linear combination of "atoms" selected
from a non-orthogonal set of elementary waveforms, or a "dictionary."
A signal can thus be represented by functions that are well-localized
in time and frequency, or are better correlated to the signal than
orthogonal bases such as a Fourier basis.
Others have shown that care must be taken when designing a dictionary,
but none have studied in detail the effects of the algorithm and
dictionary on the decomposition of different types of signals. How
good of a representation does MP provide? For what kinds of signals
does it work well? To what extents do the types of waveforms used
in the decomposition affect the results? We have investigated these
questions for synthetic and speech signals and have found that the
resulting decompositions can be inaccurate and misleading no matter
what is in the dictionary. For purposes of signal analysis this
is a disturbing flaw; but for other uses, such as signal modification
for artistic purposes, it is less problematic.

|
|
|
|
|
|